Sick of politics? Me, too. Ready to puke at the next mention of the word "vote"? Yeah. But it is that important. It's worth drilling into our heads. Vote. Vote. Vote. It might look like Obama has it wrapped up, but we thought that in 2000; some in 2004.

Vote. No matter how long you have to wait. Vote. No matter how hostile ignoramuses might be. It is worth your time. Young people with the chance to vote for the first or second time: please do it. Think about what the candidates stand for. Who do you want? What sort of administration do you want? Very important: what type of Supreme Court do you want?

The contrast between the candidates is even sharper with respect to the third branch of government. A tense equipoise currently prevails among the Justices of the Supreme Court, where four hard-core conservatives face off against four moderate liberals. Anthony M. Kennedy is the swing vote, determining the outcome of case after case.

McCain cites Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, two reliable conservatives, as models for his own prospective appointments. If he means what he says, and if he replaces even one moderate on the current Supreme Court, then Roe v. Wade will be reversed, and states will again be allowed to impose absolute bans on abortion. McCain’s views have hardened on this issue. In 1999, he said he opposed overturning Roe; by 2006, he was saying that its demise “wouldn’t bother me any”; by 2008, he no longer supported adding rape and incest as exceptions to his party’s platform opposing abortion.

But scrapping Roe—which, after all, would leave states as free to permit abortion as to criminalize it—would be just the beginning. Given the ideological agenda that the existing conservative bloc has pursued, it’s safe to predict that affirmative action of all kinds would likely be outlawed by a McCain Court. Efforts to expand executive power, which, in recent years, certain Justices have nobly tried to resist, would likely increase. Barriers between church and state would fall; executions would soar; legal checks on corporate power would wither—all with just one new conservative nominee on the Court. And the next President is likely to make three appointments.

Obama, who taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago, voted against confirming not only Roberts and Alito but also several unqualified lower-court nominees. As an Illinois state senator, he won the support of prosecutors and police organizations for new protections against convicting the innocent in capital cases. While McCain voted to continue to deny habeas-corpus rights to detainees, perpetuating the Bush Administration’s regime of state-sponsored extra-legal detention, Obama took the opposite side, pushing to restore the right of all U.S.-held prisoners to a hearing. The judicial future would be safe in his care.

Commentary

Post a comment

Remember this information?

(you may use HTML tags for style)







© 1999-2006 Brian Hathcock. This site is powered by Notepad, with a little help from Movable Type 3.2. Like all others, this Web site is best displayed by Firefox. You may contact me by e-mail or through AIM.