Sandra Bullock has to be one of the most beautiful women. (Notice the period.) She's not the best actress in the world, and most of the movies she's been in aren't Oscar worthy, but I figured it's time for me to like someone based only on his or her looks. She is it. I can't even really pinpoint the reason. I've always liked dark hair and eyes, so that may be a part of it. I don't know how synthetic that nose is, but it's a nice addition to her already pleasant facial structure. Whatever the reason, she's gorgeous as far as I'm concerned. I know I don't normally write entries like this, but I'm newly single and in my sexual prime, so I'm allowed to be attracted.

I don't hate all of the movies she's in. A Time To Kill (8/10) is a good movie, although her role is minimal. I didn't hate Speed (7/10) either. The question is: if she were to not look the way she does, would she still be a movie star? Meryl Streep isn't the prototypical beauty, but she's an excellent actor. Sandra Bullock isn't that good, but I wonder how she would've faired if she had been less attractive. I guess our entertainment isn't worth very much when you consider the fact that a person's appearance is worth most on the grading scale.

Britney Spears wouldn't be on the radio if she didn't look like she does.